USPTO serial 87268869
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julia M. Bishop
JULIA M. BISHOP TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP600 PEACHTREE STREET, NE, SUITE 5200ATLANTA, GA 30308-2216UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Assisting with the formation, negotiation and management of contracts with public sector and non-profit entities; procuring of contracts for the purchase and sale of goods and services; purchasing IT products and services for others; procurement, namely, purchasing IT products and services for others; arranging service contracts for others; procuring of contracts for others for the purchase of goods, services, and labor; business management consulting and advisory services; analytic services, namely, business data analysis, market analysis, business management analysis, and business operations analysis; marketing services; marketing research; advertising and marketing consulting; creative marketing and design services; direct mail advertising services; mail house fulfillment services; business advisory services in the field of budgeting; consulting and advisory services in connection with the aforesaid | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 20, 2011 |
| 036 | Financial consulting and advice; financial advice, namely, budget planning | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 20, 2011 |
| 042 | Software design and development; implementation of software; software maintenance; consulting in the fields of selection, implementation, and use of computer hardware and software; consulting services, namely, designing, creating, implementing and maintaining computer software for others; design and implementation of information technology solutions; IT consulting services; IT integration services; IT technical support services, namely, remote and on-site support services for monitoring, implementing, operating and maintaining computer software; consulting and advisory services in connection with the aforesaid | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 20, 2011 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2025 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 25, 2023 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2018 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 18, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 23, 2018 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 15, 2018 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 26, 2018 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 26, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 14, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2018 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 12, 2018 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2017 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 12, 2017 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Nov 29, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 27, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 9, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 27, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 29, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 23, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |