USPTO serial 87269639
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Manchester, GB
Manchester, GB
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cheryl A. Clarkin, Esq.
CHERYL A CLARKIN ESQ ADLER POLLOCK & SHEEHAN PCONE CITIZENS PLAZA 8TH FLOORPROVIDENCE, RI 02903UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Hair styling appliances, hair cutting and removal implements in the nature of hair cutting scissors, electric and non-electric hair clippers and hair trimmers; electrical hair styling appliances and apparatus in the nature of electric curling irons, electric hair straightening irons, electric hair crimpers; non-electric hair styling appliances and apparatus in the nature of non-electric curling irons, non-electric hair crimpers, hair clippers for personal use; hand-operated implements and appliances for styling hair in the nature of electric hand-held hair styling irons; hair curling instruments in the nature of curling tongs and electric and non-electric curling irons; hair tongs in the nature of electric irons for styling hair; hair waving apparatus in the nature of electric and non-electric curling irons and electric irons for styling hair; hand tools and implements for curling, styling or waving in the nature of electric and non-electric curling irons, hair straightening irons, hand-held electric irons for styling hair; hairdressing appliances; electric hair straighteners, hair clippers, hair trimmers, scissors, razors, electric and non-electric shavers; parts and fittings all for the aforesaid goods, and accessories in the nature of bags and cases specially adapted for holding or carrying all for the aforesaid goods | ABANDONED | — |
| 021 | Hair brushes and combs, electrically heated hair brushes, hair brushes with detachable handles, hot air hair brushes, hair brush barrels, hair brush barrels with detachable handles, hair brush handles, combs, double width combs, comb cases, electric combs, toothed combs for the hair, caddies for holding hair accessories for household and domestic use; parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods and accessories in the nature of bags and cases specially adapted for holding or carrying all of the aforesaid goods | ABANDONED | — |
| 026 | Hair ornaments in the nature of hair wraps, hair pins; non-electric and foam hair rollers, electric hair rollers, hair fastening articles in the nature of clam clips, hair bands, snap clips, hair curl clips, scrunchies; hair clips, hair grips, hair curlers, other than hand implements; hair curling papers, hair pins, hair ties, hair curling pins, hair fasteners in the nature of clam clips, hair bands, snap clips; hair bands, hair bows, hair slides, false hair, wigs, hair extensions, tresses of hair in the nature of hair extensions; parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods and accessories in the nature of bags and cases specially adapted for all the aforesaid goods | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2018 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 19, 2018 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 19, 2018 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 19, 2018 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 22, 2018 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 22, 2018 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 3, 2018 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 9, 2017 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2017 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Oct 27, 2017 | ISPO | WITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - PETITIONS OFFICE REQUEST | — |
| Oct 25, 2017 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 4, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 13, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 17, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 2016 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |