USPTO serial 87269801
LOGIDRIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 24, 2020
- Examiner
- LAMONT, JOHN CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with LOGIDRIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $325
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles T. J. Weigell
Charles T. J. Weigell Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.151 West 42nd Street, 17th FloorNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Gearboxes for machines; gear boxes, other than for land vehicles; speed reducers for machines; speed reducers, other than for land vehicles; speed reducing transmissions for machines; power transmissions and gearing for machines; worm gear units for machines; helical in-line gear units for machines; helical shaft-mount gear units for machines; helical-bevel gear units for machines; helical-worm gear units for machines; motors, other than for land vehicles; electric motors, other than for land vehicles; electric motors for machines; electric motors, and their parts, other than for land vehicles; gear motors for machines; gearmotors, other than for land vehicles; helical inline geared motors for machines; helical inline geared motors, other than for land vehicles; parallel shaft geared motors for machines; parallel shaft geared motors, other than for land vehicles; helical bevel geared motors for machines; helical bevel geared motors, other than for land vehicles; worm geared motors for machines; worm geared motors, other than for land vehicles; motors, namely, alternating current motors, other than for land vehicles; motors, namely, synchronous motors, other than for land vehicles; asynchronous motors, other than for land vehicles; inverter motors, other than for land vehicles; motor starters; electronic motor starters; starters for motors; soft starters for motors; drives for machines; drives for motors; variable speed drives for machines and motors; variable frequency drives for machines and motors; variable frequency drives for motors, other than for land vehicles; AC vector drives for machines and motors; mechanical variable speed drives for machines; gear drives for machines and motors; machine parts, namely, gear drives; variable speed drives for use with fluid pumping systems; motors, gears and drives for orientating solar panels; AC variable frequency drives that are used to control small and medium-sized motors in applications such as manufacturing processes, HVAC and pumps; assemblies for machines comprised of a motor, an electrical drive, and at least one of a gear drive, gear box or speed reducer; and assemblies for machines comprised of a motor, at least one of an inverter, a drive invertor, a frequency inverter, a frequency converter, an electrical controller, an electromechanical controller, an electronic speed controller, an industrial automation controller, a motor starter, a drive for machines, a drive for motors, or a gear drive for machines and motors, and at least one of a gearbox for machines, a speed reducer for machines, a speed reducing transmission for machines, a power transmission and gearing for machines, a gear unit for machines, or a geared motor for machines; all the foregoing for intralogistics applications, including airport intralogistics | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 24, 2025 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2020 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 17, 2020 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2020 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 26, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2020 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 25, 2020 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 25, 2020 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 18, 2020 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2020 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 11, 2020 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 18, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2020 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 16, 2020 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 19, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2019 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 17, 2019 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 16, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 16, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 22, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 2, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 17, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 15, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 17, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 16, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 13, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 13, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 22, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 21, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |