USPTO serial 87270077
NATO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 29, 2022
- Examiner
- BECHHOFER, YOCHEVED D
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 700 means the trademark is registered and active on the Principal Register. You have nationwide rights for the listed goods and services and may use ®. Section 8 maintenance is due between years five and six. Calendar Section 8 between years five and six, and consider trademark monitoring.
Need help with NATO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Brunswick, OH
Brunswick, OH
DOVER, DE
Medina, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey J. Banyas
Jeffrey J. Banyas Sisson & Banyas, Attorneys at Law, LLC303 N. Court St., P.O. Box 867Medina, OH 44258United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Decals; Pens | ACTIVE | Dec 12, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by International Watchman, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by International Watchman, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ANDOM, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by International Watchman, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named NATO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 2024 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 18, 2024 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Oct 18, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 18, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2024 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2024 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2022 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 11, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 22, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 8, 2021 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 30, 2021 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 30, 2021 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Nov 30, 2020 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Oct 22, 2020 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Oct 2, 2019 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 11, 2019 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 24, 2019 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 10, 2019 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2019 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2019 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2019 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 11, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 12, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 13, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 10, 2018 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 7, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2018 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 7, 2018 | PGTT | PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2018 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 16, 2018 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 6, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 6, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 10, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 6, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 6, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 7, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 3, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 3, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 11, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 13, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2017 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 26, 2017 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Mar 17, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 16, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |