USPTO serial 87270586
THE PATIO MARKETPLACE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROOKSHIRE, DAVID AARON
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE PATIO MARKETPLACE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maria Johnson
Maria Johnson DE NOVO LEGAL, PC2055 CORTE DEL NOGALCARLSBAD, CA 92011UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Prepared foods and packaged foods for retail sale, namely, prepackaged meals and boxed dinners primarily comprised of meats, poultry, fish, seafood, game, meat substitutes, tofu, processed vegetables, and salads except macaroni, rice and pasta salad in the nature of tuna salad, chicken salad, potato salad, garden salad, Caesar salad, cobb salad, Mediterranean salad, kale salad, beet salad, and coleslaw salad; prepared foods and packaged foods for retail sale, namely, prepackaged meals and boxed dinners primarily comprised of cooked vegetables, hummus, cheese, eggs, cheese, processed fruit, soups, and sides in the nature of applesauce, baked beans, mashed potatoes, and cooked vegetables; prepared meals consisting primarily of meats, poultry, fish, seafood, game, meat substitutes, tofu, processed vegetables, and salads except macaroni, rice and pasta salad in the nature of tuna salad, chicken salad, potato salad, garden salad, Caesar salad, cobb salad, Mediterranean salad, kale salad, beet salad, and coleslaw salad; prepared meals consisting primarily of cooked vegetables, hummus, cheese, eggs, cheese, processed fruit and soups; grocery products, namely, applesauce, cooked fruits and vegetables, potato chips, jams, jellies, marmalades; Prepared meals to go consisting primarily of meats, poultry, fish, seafood, game, meat substitutes, tofu processed vegetables, and salads except macaroni, rice and pasta salad in the nature of tuna salad, chicken salad, potato salad, garden salad, Caesar salad, cobb salad, Mediterranean salad, kale salad, and beet salad; Prepared meals to go consisting primarily of cooked vegetables, hummus, cheese, processed fruit and soups | ACTIVE | Jan 9, 2017 |
| 030 | Prepared foods and packaged foods for retail sale, namely, prepackaged meals and boxed dinners primarily comprised of pasta, rice, pizza, farro, and salads in the nature of macaroni salad, rice salad, quinoa salad, noodle salad, wild rice salad and fattoush salad; prepared foods and packaged foods for retail sale, namely, prepackaged meals and boxed dinners primarily comprised of veggie quinoa wrap, wild rice veggie wrap, sandwiches, chicken Caesar wrap, bacon chicken ranch wrap, pastries, and desserts in the nature of pies, cakes, and bakery desserts; prepared foods and packaged foods for retail sale, namely, prepackaged meals and boxed dinners primarily comprised of sides in the nature of macaroni and cheese, cooked rice, granola berry parfait, fruit and yogurt dip parfait, and crackers; prepared meals, consisting primarily of pasta, rice, pizza, farro, sandwiches, chicken Caesar wrap, bacon chicken ranch wrap, and salads in the nature of macaroni salad, rice salad, quinoa salad, noodle salad, wild rice salad, and fattoush salad; prepared meals, consisting primarily of granola berry parfait, fruit and yogurt dip parfait, veggie quinoa wrap, wild rice veggie wrap; grocery products in the nature of corn bread, macaroni and cheese, candy, breads, salsa, pretzel chips, bread, sauces, condiments in the nature of ketchup, savory sauces; grocery products, namely, tea, coffee, drinks and beverages in the nature of espresso drinks, coffee based beverages; Prepared meals to go consisting primarily of pasta, rice, pizza, farro, sandwiches, chicken caesar wrap, bacon chicken ranch wrap, granola berry parfait, fruit and yogurt dip parfait, and salads in the nature of macaroni salad, rice salad, quinoa salad, noodle salad, wild rice salad and fattoush salad; Prepared meals to go consisting primarily of veggie quinoa wrap, wild rice veggie wrap, and desserts in the nature of pies, cakes, and bakery dessert | ACTIVE | Jan 9, 2017 |
| 035 | Retail store services, marketplace services, and online retail store and marketplace services featuring gourmet foods, dishes, drinks, beverages, and juices, tea and tea accessories, coffee and coffee accessories, home and textile goods; Retail delicatessen services; Retail grocery store services | ACTIVE | Jan 9, 2017 |
| 043 | Restaurant services; Grab 'n go food services, namely, take-out restaurant services; Restaurant, café, and cocktail lounge services; Bar services; Take-out restaurant services; Catering services and restaurants featuring home delivery; Restaurant services, namely, providing food and beverages for consumption on and off the premises; Casual dining restaurant services; Food and drink services through food trucks, namely, providing of food and drink via a mobile truck | ACTIVE | Jan 9, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Patio Marketplace, LP
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named THE PATIO MARKETPLACE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 11, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 2, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 9, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 11, 2019 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2019 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 4, 2019 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 4, 2019 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 3, 2019 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2018 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2018 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2018 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 28, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 28, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 28, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 26, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 30, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 7, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 22, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 22, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 2016 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |