Drawing for PHYSIOMER

USPTO serial 87271374

PHYSIOMER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE, DOUGLAS
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PHYSIOMER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark Lebow

MARK LEBOW Ladas & ParrySUITE 1051700 DIAGONAL ROADALEXANDRIA, VA 22314

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Appliances for washing body cavities; dropper bottles for administering medication, sold empty; sprayers for medical purposes, namely, sprayers for repairing, washing, hygiene, decongestion, disinfection, humidification, and rehydration of body cavities; medical appliances for the treatment of nasal cavity and pharynx problems and disorders in the field of otorhinolaryngologyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 24, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 24, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 30, 2018CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 30, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 17, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2018EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
May 19, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 17, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 17, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 17, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 21, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 26, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 26, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 6, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 12, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 7, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 5, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 5, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 5, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 8, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 22, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 20, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance