USPTO serial 87271542
RAPID FAB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MEIER, SHARON A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RAPID FAB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter D. Murray, Esq.
LAURA ALOS COOPER & DUNHAM LLP30 ROCKEFELLER PLAZA 20TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10112UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Three-dimensional printers; computer driven machine for making three-dimensional embodiments of computer generated designs; computer software for three-dimensional printers | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business management analysis and business consultancy, marketing research and analysis, and providing information concerning commercial sales in the field of three-dimensional printers; marketing services in the field of three-dimensional printers and machines for producing three-dimensional molded parts for third parties; retail store services in the field of three-dimensional printers and machines; organizing exhibitions for commercial and advertising purposes in the field of three dimensional printing | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Repair and maintenance of three-dimensional printers; Troubleshooting in the nature of the repair of 3D printers | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Treating metal; processing of rubber; processing of plastics; ceramic processing; treatment of materials in the nature of stone; providing specialized three-dimensional printing services of biomedical tissues, namely, artificial bones, artificial skins, artificial blood vessels, artificial joints, artificial muscles and artificial organs; rental of three-dimensional printers; providing three-dimensional printing services for others; providing custom three-dimensional printing services; Technical support services, namely, providing technical advice related to three-dimensional printing | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Engineering design services; Design for new product development; providing engineering consultation in the field of three-dimensional printing; providing engineering information in the field of three-dimensional printing; design of three-dimensional printing systems; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems for 3D-printing; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software for three-dimensional printers, namely, for designing 3D models and configuring its forming process; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software for facilitating the downloading, modification and sharing data of three-dimensional designs, for use in connection with three-dimensional printers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ricoh Company, Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named RAPID FAB
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2018 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 6, 2018 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 6, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 25, 2018 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jun 8, 2018 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2018 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2018 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 7, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 30, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2018 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 30, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 30, 2018 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 30, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 30, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 29, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 31, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |