USPTO serial 87272992
CALIBER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HESIK, APRIL ANNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 124 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CALIBER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Hun Ohm
Hun Ohm Fierst Bloomberg Ohm LLP64 Gothic Street, Ste 4Northampton, MA 01060UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer games software; computer game discs; video game software; computer game software for video games or for games machines; computer programs for video and computer games; video discs featuring strategy games relating to armed conflict; optical discs featuring strategy games relating to armed conflict; audio tapes featuring strategy games relating to armed conflict; prerecorded video cassettes featuring strategy games relating to armed conflict; compact discs featuring strategy games relating to armed conflict; data bearing record carriers for computers, namely, prerecorded magnetic data carriers featuring strategy games relating to armed conflict; video recordings featuring strategy games relating to armed conflict; computer game software for playing video, computer and on-line games; software for enabling video, computer and on-line games to be run on multiple platforms; downloadable software for developing, designing, modifying and customizing video, computer and on-line games; computer games adapted for use with tv receivers; computer game software for use on mobile phones; downloadable electronic publications in the nature of newsletters, journals, magazines and guidebooks in the field of strategy games relating to armed conflict provided on-line from databases for the Internet; video games enhancers, namely, high performance computer hardware with specialized features for enhanced game playing ability; structural parts for all the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Printed matter, namely, newsletters, journals, magazines and guidebooks in the field of strategy games relating to armed conflict; printed matter relating to computer games and entertainment, namely, newsletters, journals, magazines and guidebooks in the field of strategy games relating to armed conflict; stationery; stickers, decals | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment provided via the Internet, namely, providing online massively multi-player video games; on-line gaming services, namely, providing online massively multi-player war games; entertainment services, namely, providing on- line massively multi-player computer games; on-line entertainment services in the nature of online computer game tournaments; entertainment services in the nature of sports leagues relating to armed conflict; entertainment services, namely, production and distribution of games shows; providing on-line information in the field of computer gaming entertainment; providing on-line non-downloadable electronic publications in the nature of newsletters, journals, magazines and guidebooks in the field of strategy games relating to armed conflict | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 16, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 3, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 3, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 2, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 29, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 23, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 22, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 9, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 6, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 6, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 26, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 26, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 19, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 8, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 27, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |