USPTO serial 87274415
HAWAIIAN HOKKAIDO CRÈME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5521343Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 17, 2018
- Examiner
- KON, ELISSA GARBER
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HAWAIIAN HOKKAIDO CRÈME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George W. Brandt
George W. Brandt LYONS, BRANDT, COOK & HIRAMATSU841 BISHOP STREET, SUITE 1800HONOLULU, HI 96813UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Ice cream mixes; Ice cream substitute; Frozen confections, all made in whole or significant part from Hokkaido cream | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 5, 2018 |
| 043 | Restaurant services; Restaurant services, including sit-down service of food and take-out restaurant services; Ice cream shop services in the nature of a restaurant; Providing of food and drink via a mobile truck, featuring ice cream and dairy products made in whole or significant part from Hokkaido cream | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 5, 2018 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2025 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 17, 2023 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 2, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2018 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 8, 2018 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 8, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 29, 2018 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 28, 2018 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 28, 2018 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 24, 2018 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 24, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 24, 2018 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 15, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2018 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 15, 2018 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 14, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2018 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 28, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 23, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 23, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 28, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |