USPTO serial 87274417
LIL' DIPPER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EISNACH, MICHAEL PATRICK
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LIL' DIPPER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maya L. Tarr
MAYA L TARR PROSKAUER ROSE LLPELEVEN TIMES SQUARENEW YORK, NY 10036-8299UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Perfumes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2018 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 31, 2018 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 8, 2018 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2018 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2018 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 26, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 17, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2018 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 17, 2018 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 17, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 17, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 21, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 22, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 28, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |