USPTO serial 87275401
BEAST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWN, BARBARA TROFFKIN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BEAST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan Grant Morton
Jonathan Grant Morton Morton & Associates, LLP246 WEST BROADWAYNew York, NY 10013UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Precious stones, precious pearls and metals, and their imitations; jewelry; horological instruments; boxes in precious metals; amulets of precious materials; collectible, commemorative, non-monetary coins; silver objects, namely, silver ores, silver ingots, silver alloy, silver thread jewelry; statues and figurines made precious metals or stones; ornaments made or covered with precious or semi-precious metals or stones in the nature of jewelry; jewelry boxes and watch boxes | ACTIVE | — |
| 026 | Hair accessories, namely, plastic styling inserts that create height and volume on the crown of the head, hair sticks, kaw clips, claw clips, snap clips, Wigs, hairpieces, and add-in and add-on hair accessories, twisters and hair ties; decorative articles for the hair, namely, barrettes; elastic of hair; hair extensions; ribbons for the hair; braids for hair; needles; buttons; sewing boxes; artificial flowers; artificial flowers arrangements without being Christmas trees; artificial fruit; artificial plants | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Advertising services; commercial business management; commercial administration; office works | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Education, namely, teaching and training in the fields of art, music and artistic performances, entertainment, fashion, sports, culture, general human interest, film production, languages, science and technology, law; conducting math classes; organization of sports competitions except speedboat rides, golf, snowboarding, skiing, hiking, mountain biking, horse back riding, tennis, swimming; conducting and organizing cultural events and activities except haunted houses, amusement parks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BEAST INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named BEAST
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 15, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 3, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 20, 2020 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 19, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 9, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 6, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 29, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 23, 2019 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 23, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 11, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 30, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 13, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 1, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 27, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 12, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 15, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 21, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 30, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |