Drawing for LIKE-NU

USPTO serial 87276526

LIKE-NU

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CHIANG, TIFFANY YOUNG
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LIKE-NU?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul K. Tomita

PAUL K. TOMITA STANIFORD TOMITA LLPPO BOX 591838SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94159UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
002Concrete repair, restoration, and resurfacing materials, namely, concrete sealants in the nature of epoxy and urethane based sealants for concrete surfaces, concrete color stains and concrete color dyesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 24, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 24, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 9, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Oct 8, 2019EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Oct 8, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Aug 22, 2019NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED
Aug 22, 2019TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION
Aug 22, 2019PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Aug 22, 2019PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Jul 23, 2019EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jan 25, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jan 23, 2019EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jan 23, 2019EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jan 23, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 25, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jul 23, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jul 23, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jul 23, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 23, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 28, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Nov 28, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 8, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Oct 26, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 20, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 9, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 27, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 26, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 26, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 29, 2017GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 29, 2017GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 29, 2017CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 22, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 4, 2017MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED
Jan 3, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Dec 24, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance