USPTO serial 87277004
BETTERU BETTER EDUCATION · BETTER JOB · BETTER LIFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORAN, CAROLINE L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BETTERU BETTER EDUCATION · BETTER JOB · BETTER LIFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ottawa, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karin Segall
Karin Segall LEASON ELLIS LLPONE BARKER AVENUE, FIFTH FLOORWHITE PLAINS, NY 10601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Aggregator of online education, namely, operating online marketplaces featuring educational courses and educational course materials and, all in a wide variety of preschool, elementary, primary, secondary, college, graduate and post graduate disciplines all for a marketplace that services mass market learners across K-12, professional development, skills development, higher education and self-interest related content | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Aggregator of online professional educational services, namely, operating online marketplaces featuring job placement services, tutoring services, counseling services and assessment services all for a marketplace that services mass market learners across K-12, professional development, skills development, higher education and self-interest related content | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 25, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 23, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 30, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 30, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 4, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 30, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 23, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 20, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 4, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 3, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 4, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 7, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 24, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 27, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2017 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 24, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |