Drawing for DEEZER FLOW

USPTO serial 87277704

DEEZER FLOW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SNYDER, NELSON B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DEEZER FLOW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Caitlin R. Byczko

Caitlin R. Byczko Barnes & Thornburg LLP11 South Meridian StreetIndianapolis, IN 46204-3535UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035On-line retail store services featuring downloadable pre-recorded music and video; Providing an Internet website portal featuring links to music-related merchandise for retail purposes; Market research and analysis in the field of music publishing; Opinion polling of consumers and professionals in the field of music publishing, including online on a global computer network; Organization of events with the aim of promoting the sale of music publishing goods via the Internet; Auctioneering of music publishing goods; Demonstration of music publishing goodsACTIVE—
038Broadcasting services, namely, digital audio broadcasting services provided via a global communications network; Providing access to digital music websites on the Internet; Internet radio broadcasting services; Telecommunication services, namely, wireless telephone services featuring music and music information; Providing access on demand to a web site of musical works and video clips; Providing access to on-line computer reference databases of musical works and video clips; Audiovisual communication services, namely, services for transmitting streamed media over the internet; Radio broadcasting; Television broadcasting; Providing of online access to musical databases; Transmission of audio and visual information and data contained in databases; Providing access to computer databases and websites of others by means of a global communications network; Providing access to and operating internet chatrooms and virtual discussion forumsACTIVE—
041Written text editing; Editing of images in the nature of film, photo, and video editing; Editing of sounds; Providing an Internet website portal in the field of music; Entertainment services, namely, providing nondownloadable prerecorded music via a global communications network and providing nondownloadable prerecorded music according to consumer preferences via a global communications network; Provision of information relating to music; On-line journals, namely, blogs featuring music; Radio and television entertainment in the nature of ongoing series featuring information in the field of music, songs and music videoclips, singers and music artists, concerts and musical performances, provided on-line via the Internet; Music programming in the nature of scheduling music programs on a global computer network; On-line publication of musical texts and production of video clips; Providing on-line databases of musical works and music video clips; Entertainment, namely, providing interactive electronic radio and television games services linked to music by means of the Internet; Online production and editing of films and television films, television programs, radio programs, and audiovisual programs featuring debates, interviews and documentaries; Editing of radio and television programs; Arranging and conducting of interactive educational discussion conferences on-lineACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 5, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 5, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 25, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 21, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 21, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 21, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 21, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 21, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 29, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 27, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 27, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 2, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 7, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 7, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 18, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 5, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 2, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 20, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 19, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 18, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 18, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 30, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 6, 2017MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jan 5, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 27, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance