USPTO serial 87278229
SAMOVAR CHAI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROWDER-SCHAEFER, ANDREW W
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SAMOVAR CHAI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
RANCHO CORDOVA, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LISA LIU
LISA LIU THE MITZEL GROUP LLP44 MONTGOMERY STREET, STE 1660SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Household goods, namely, tea pots, tea cups and mugs, tea infusers, tea strainers, tea caddies, tea canisters, tea kettles, and tea sets | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Tea, herb tea, herbal tea, iced tea, green tea, black tea, white tea, tea-based beverages with fruit flavoring, tea bags | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Restaurant, cafe and restaurant services, carry out restaurant services, tea rooms, restaurant and catering services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 27, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 24, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |