USPTO serial 87278988
LIGHTHOUSE SMARTSERIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5706597Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 26, 2019
- Examiner
- CALIENDO, COURTNEY MICHELLE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LIGHTHOUSE SMARTSERIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Lighthouse Document Technologies, Inc.
Seattle, WA
Other trademarks owned by Lighthouse Document Technologies, Inc.
Lighthouse Document Technologies, Inc.
Seattle, WA
Other trademarks owned by Lighthouse Document Technologies, Inc.
Lighthouse Document Technologies, Inc.
Seattle, WA
Other trademarks owned by Lighthouse Document Technologies, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Yvonne E. Tingleaf
YVONNE E. TINGLEAF SCHWABE, WILLIAMSON & WYATT, P.C.1211 SW FIFTH AVENUESUITE 1500PORTLAND, OR 97204Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Legal project management services in the nature of providing legal docket management for others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 22, 2013 |
| 042 | Temporary use of non-downloadable software for electronic discovery management; Temporary use of non-downloadable software used to consolidate email threads; Temporary use of non-downloadable software used to group near-duplicate documents together for easy review of differences; Temporary use of non-downloadable software used to reduce document populations, minimizing review of non-responsive documents; Temporary use of non-downloadable software used to group documents into categories of legal privilege for review; Temporary use of non-downloadable software used by reviewers to search for words, phrases, sentences, or other blocks of data across a matter and to assist in the redaction of those words or phrases; Conversion of data or documents from physical to electronic media; Hosting of digital content on the Internet in the nature of documents for review, analysis, searching and retrieval of information; Consulting in the field of electronic storage of documents; Computer project management services in the field of electronic discovery via global computer networks for national and international law firms and companies; Document management services for litigation support, namely, electronic storage of files, emails, records, and documents for national and international law firms and companies; Electronic storage services for archiving databases, images, and other electronic data; Remote computer data backup services, namely, electronic storage service for archiving databases, applications, images, and other electronic data; Electronic storage of documents and archived e-mails; Electronic storage services for archiving databases, images, or other electronic data; Consultation in the field of data archiving; Remote computer data backup services, namely, electronic storage service for archiving databases, images, and other electronic data | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 22, 2013 |
| 045 | Electronic legal discovery services in the nature of reviewing emails and other electronically stored information and conducting data management, data preservation, data collection, data recovery, data forensics, data processing, data analysis, data review, data hosting, data production, data reduction, and database reconstruction of e-mails and other electronically stored information that could be relevant evidence in a lawsuit for national and international law firms and companies; Litigation support services, namely, providing review of electronically stored documents for national and international law firms and companies; Electronic legal discovery and litigation support services, namely, conducting litigation support services and performing electronic legal discovery in the nature of reviewing e-mails and other electronically stored information that could be relevant evidence in a lawsuit via computer networks and the Internet; Litigation consulting services; Electronic discovery consulting services; Legal discovery management services in the nature of conducting electronic legal discovery in the nature of reviewing e-mails and other electronically stored information that could be relevant evidence in a lawsuit; Legal project management services in the nature of litigation support services; Litigation support services, namely, reviewing e-mails and other electronically stored information that could be relevant evidence in a lawsuit, and conducting electronic legal discovery data management, collections, forensics, processing, analysis, review, hosting, production and consulting of e-mails, electronically stored data and information that could be relevant evidence in a lawsuit for national and international law firms and companies ; Electronic document discovery and litigation support services, namely, conducting litigation support services and performing electronic legal discovery in the nature of reviewing e-mails and other electronically stored information that could be relevant evidence in a lawsuit via computer networks and the Internet; Legal support services, namely, providing review of electronically stored documents for law firm and corporate departments | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 22, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lighthouse Document Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Lighthouse Document Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Lighthouse Document Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named LIGHTHOUSE SMARTSERIES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2025 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 26, 2024 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2020 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 26, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 8, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 19, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 20, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 31, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 30, 2018 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 30, 2018 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 30, 2018 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 5, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 24, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 29, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2017 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |