USPTO serial 87279696
EXTENDAFILL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EXTENDAFILL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sherwood Park, Alberta, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert A. Nissen
ROBERT A. NISSEN NISSEN PATENT LAWSUITE 200, 10328-81 AVEEDMONTON, ALBERTA, T6E1X2CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | diesel truck parts that increase access to the inlet of a diesel fuel tank, namely, piping that extends the neck of a fuel inlet; recreational vehicle parts that increase access to the inlet of a diesel fuel tank of the recreational vehicle, namely, piping that extends the neck of a fuel inlet; threaded hollow metal sleeves that in use connect to a threaded inlet of a fuel tank to effectively extend the length of the threaded inlet | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 11, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 26, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 28, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 27, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 11, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 8, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 16, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 28, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 30, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2017 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |