USPTO serial 87281034
INSPIRED NATURALS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAI, TINA HSIN
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INSPIRED NATURALS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James D. Stevens
JAMES D. STEVENS REISING ETHINGTON P.C.P.O. BOX 4390TROY, MI 48099-4390UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Canned beans; cheese; frozen fruits; dried fruits; nut-based snack foods; seed-based snack foods; processed meat; nut butters; almond butter; peanut butter; processed oils for food; processed nuts; hummus; soups; broth; processed tomatoes; diced tomatoes; tomato paste; frozen vegetables; frozen seafood and fish; packaged meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry, or vegetables; dairy and dairy-based products; milk-based products; and egg-based products | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Grain-based snack foods; processed oat-based food to be used as a breakfast food or snack food; breakfast cereals; granola; packaged meals consisting primarily of processed grains, pasta, rice, couscous, or quinoa; pasta sauce; pasta; salsa; salad dressings; agave syrup for use as a natural sweetener; honey; maple syrup; tomato sauce; vinegar; balsamic vinegar; wine vinegar; sauces in the nature of condiments; ketchup; mustard; mayonnaise; marinades; spice rubs for meats and fish; seasoning mixes; food seasonings; pizza; crackers; popcorn; pretzels; cookies; and bakery goods and dessert items | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Preparations for making fruit-based beverages; fruit juices; and vegetable juices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lipari Foods Operating Company, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named INSPIRED NATURALS
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 13, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 29, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 2017 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |