Drawing for CAMOUFLAGED FASHIONS USA

USPTO serial 87281827

CAMOUFLAGED FASHIONS USA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KUNG, KAELIE ELIZABETH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CAMOUFLAGED FASHIONS USA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gregory B. Perleberg

Gregory B. Perleberg Pierson Ferdinand LLP578 Washington Blvd.Suite 712Marina del Rey, CA 90292

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024Fabrics for use in the manufacture of clothingACTIVE—
035Wholesale store services featuring high fashion fabrics and textiles for use in the manufacture and production of designer clothingACTIVE—
040Fashion and textile manufacturing services for others in the field of woven fabrics and textiles, fabric and textile panels, trimming and other textiles and textile accessoriesACTIVE—
042Fashion and textile design, namely, design of woven fabric and textiles, fabric and textile panels, trimming and other textiles and textile accessoriesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 7, 2026TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2026ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 7, 2026REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 14, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 16, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 15, 2019EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 15, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 25, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2019CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 25, 2019COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2019NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Mar 18, 2019TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Mar 18, 2019PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 18, 2019PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2019EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 12, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 10, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 10, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 14, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 12, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 12, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 12, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 20, 2017CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Oct 20, 2017COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Oct 20, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 18, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 18, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 28, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 6, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 6, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 6, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 6, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 6, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 11, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 11, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 11, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 9, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 7, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 7, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 7, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 3, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 3, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 3, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 15, 2017CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 15, 2017COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 30, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance