USPTO serial 87282912
WILD CHILD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CANTOR, JILLIAN REDDING
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WILD CHILD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stacy J. Grossman
STACY J. GROSSMAN LAW OFFICE OF STACY J. GROSSMAN888 SEVENTH AVENUE, 10TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10106UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Seafood croquettes; dutch chicken crocquettes (kroketten); cheese, vegetable croquettes; vegetable cheese croquettes; breakfast bars, namely, nut-based food bars; fruit-filled breakfast bars, namely, nut based food bars also having a fruit filling; appetizers, namely, appetizers consisting primarily of seafood, appetizers consisting primarily of vegetables; appetizers consisting primarily of potatoes, appetizers consisting primarily of cheese, appetizers consisting primarily of truffles, and appetizers consisting primarily of mushrooms; frozen appetizers, namely frozen appetizers consisting primarily of seafood, frozen appetizers consisting primarily of vegetables; frozen appetizers consisting primarily of potatoes, frozen appetizers consisting primarily of cheese, frozen appetizers consisting primarily of truffles, and frozen appetizers consisting primarily of mushrooms | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Cookies; brownies; cakes; biscotti; crepes; muffins; waffles; biscuits; bread; cakes; pies; tarts; pastries and shortbread; chocolate; confectionery, namely, candy; multigrain based snack bars; chocolate filled waffles; custard filled waffles; waffles filled with fruit preserves; vegetable filled waffles; cheese filled waffles; waffle chips; chocolate filled crepes; custard filled crepes; crepes filled with fruit preserves; vegetable filled crepes; cheese filled crepes; pancakes; mini pancakes; cinnamon gingerbread cookie sweet spread creams; children cookies; children biscuits; breakfast cereal; breakfast bars, namely, grain-based food bars; fruit filled breakfast bars, namely, grain-based food bars also having a fruit filling; dessert croquettes; chocolate filled croquettes; cookie butter filled croquettes; churros; sweet churros; savory churros; almond thins; ginger cookies; appetizers, namely appetizers consisting primarily of cornmeal; frozen appetizers, namely, frozen appetizers consisting primarily of cornmeal; frozen pastries; frozen desserts, namely, cakes, tarts, cheesecakes, fondants, moelleux, ganaches, apple crumbles; coffee; tea; dough enrobed appetizers consisting primarily of a dough-based wrapper with fillings consisting primarily of seafood, vegetables, potatoes, cheese, truffles and mushrooms; frozen dough enrobed appetizers consisting primarily of a dough-based wrapper with fillings consisting primarily of seafood, vegetables, potatoes, cheese, truffles and mushrooms | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 22, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 21, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 10, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 17, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 25, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 5, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 13, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 15, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 15, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 24, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 17, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 31, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |