CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for MOONSHOT

USPTO serial 87283254

MOONSHOT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RICHARDS, SUSAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MOONSHOT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jonathan Pearce

Jonathan Pearce SoCal IP Law Group LLP310 N Westlake Boulevard, Suite 120Westlake Village, CA 91362UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Amusement and game apparatus adapted for use with an external display screen or monitor, namely, passive and active controllers adapted for use in playing video games and participating in virtual reality and augmented reality environments in which users can interact for recreational, leisure, educational, or entertainment purposesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 5, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 5, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 23, 2017ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 4, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 9, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 9, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 19, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 29, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 24, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 21, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 21, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2017MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Jan 10, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 31, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance