USPTO serial 87283285
MOI - MODELO DE LOS OBJECTIVOS INTEGRALES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AVENT, TEAGUE A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 126
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MOI - MODELO DE LOS OBJECTIVOS INTEGRALES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mariana Paula Noli
Mariana Paula Noli NOLI IP Solutions PC5030 Bella Collina StreetOceanside, CA 92056UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Class 42: Provision of scientific information, advice and consultancy in the fields engineering, physics, chemistry, geology, water treatment, and waste recycling; Provision of advice and consultancy, in relation to the technology in the field of engineering, physics, chemistry, water treatment, waste recycling, business development, business management as well as computer technology, alternative environmental sustainability technology, architectural technology, creative environmental sustainability technology, disruptive innovation being environmental sustainability, high tech in the field of environmental sustainability, industrial technology, low technology in the field of environmental sustainability, micro technology, open source appropriate environmental sustainability technology; Technical research in the field of engineering, physics, chemistry, water treatment, waste recycling, business development, business management as well as computer technology, alternative environmental sustainability technology, architectural technology, creative environmental sustainability technology, disruptive innovation being environmental sustainability, high tech in the field of environmental sustainability, industrial technology, low technology in the field of environmental sustainability, micro technology, open source appropriate environmental sustainability technology; Provision of advice and consultancy, in relation to the development of technology in the field of engineering, physics, chemistry, water treatment, waste recycling, business development, business management as well as computer technology, alternative environmental sustainability technology, architectural technology, creative environmental sustainability technology, disruptive innovation being environmental sustainability, high tech in the field of environmental sustainability, industrial technology, low technology in the field of environmental sustainability, micro technology, open source appropriate environmental sustainability technology; Development of new technologies for others in the field of engineering, physics, chemistry, water treatment, waste recycling, business development, business management as well as computer technology, alternative environmental sustainability technology, architectural technology, creative environmental sustainability technology, disruptive innovation being environmental sustainability, high tech in the field of environmental sustainability, industrial technology, low technology in the field of environmental sustainability, micro technology, open source appropriate environmental sustainability technology; Development of industrial processes, namely, general industrial process for helping maintain quality and energy efficiency, chemical processes for helping maintain quality and energy efficiency, physical processes for helping maintain quality and energy efficiency, electrical processes for helping maintain quality and energy efficiency, mechanical processes for helping maintain quality and energy efficiency; Scientific research, scientific and industrial research in the field of engineering, physics, chemistry, water treatment, waste recycling, business development, business management as well as computer technology, alternative environmental sustainability technology, architectural technology, creative environmental sustainability technology, disruptive innovation being environmental sustainability, high tech in the field of environmental sustainability, industrial technology, low technology in the field of environmental sustainability, micro technology, open source appropriate environmental sustainability technology; Research in the field of engineering; Scientific research and development in the field of engineering, physics, chemistry, water treatment, waste recycling, business development, business management as well as computer technology, alternative environmental sustainability technology, architectural technology, creative environmental sustainability technology, disruptive innovation being environmental sustainability, high tech in the field of environmental sustainability, industrial technology, low technology in the field of environmental sustainability, micro technology, open source appropriate environmental sustainability technology | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 26, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 28, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 27, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 27, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 25, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 24, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 31, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |