USPTO serial 87283512
MIHALIK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FLETCHER, TRACY L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MIHALIK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daoyou Tim Liu
DAOYOU TIM LIU LIU LAW GROUP, PLLC101 PARKLANE BLVD SUITE 103SUGAR LAND, TX 77478UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | 3D spectacles; Eyeglass cases; Eyeglass frames; Eyeglass lenses; Eyeglasses; Glasses for sports; Lenses for sunglasses; Spectacle cases; Spectacle frames; Spectacle holders; Spectacle lenses; Spectacles; Spectacles; Spectacles and sunglasses; Spectacles, frames and cases; Sunglass chains and cords; Sunglass cords; Sunglass lenses; Sunglasses; Sunglasses and spectacles; Anti-dazzle spectacles; Anti-glare glasses; Anti-glare spectacles; Antireflection coated eyeglasses; Cases for eyeglasses and sunglasses; Cases for spectacles and sunglasses; Cases for eyeglasses and sunglasses; Cases for spectacles and sunglasses; Chains for eyeglasses; Chains for spectacles; Chains for spectacles and for sunglasses; Chains for spectacles and for sunglasses; Contact lens blanks; Contact lens cases; Contact lenses; Containers for contact lens; Corrective glasses; Cyclists' glasses; Eyeglass lenses; Eyewear, namely, sunglasses, eyeglasses and ophthalmic frames and cases therefor; Eyewear, namely, sunglasses, eyeglasses and ophthalmic frames and cases therefor; Field-glasses; Frames for eyeglasses and pince-nez; Frames for spectacles; Frames for spectacles and sunglasses; Frames for spectacles and sunglasses; Glacier eyeglasses; Laser equipment designed for drilling optical lenses for eyeglasses; Laser equipment designed for drilling optical lenses for eyeglasses; Lenses for sunglasses; Magnifying glasses; Magnifying glasses that fit on the user's face in the manner of eyeglasses; Magnifying lenses; Magnifying glasses that fit on the user's face in the manner of eyeglasses; Nose guards which can be worn by attachment to eyewear such as sunglasses and ski goggles; Novelty eyeglasses; Optical glasses; Optical lens sights; Optical lenses; Polarizing spectacles; Protective eyeglasses; Protective glasses; Protective spectacles; Reading eyeglasses; Reading glasses; Side guards for eyeglasses; Ski glasses; Spectacle lens blanks; Spectacle lenses; Spectacles; Spectacles and sunglasses; Sports glasses; Sports training eyeglasses; Sunglass lenses; Sunglasses and spectacles; Theatre glasses; Visual training aid, namely, non-prescription glasses used for visual training purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 30, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 1, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 31, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |