USPTO serial 87284408
IOTRUST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAJA, AMER YASIN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IOTRUST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barbara Grahn
Barbara Grahn FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP222 SOUTH NINTH STSUITE 2000MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software to secure interaction between and among users, computer networks, the internet, and connected devices; Computer software for identity and access management and data security across infrastructure, devices and networks; Computer software that facilitates identity federation across infrastructure, devices and networks; Computer software for device management, namely, software over the air (SOTA), firmware over the air (FOTA), and software to facilitate updates and remote diagnostics; Computer software for data analytics, namely, data aggregation, filtering and edge-analytics; Computer software for authentication, authorization, and encryption; Computer software for identity and access management, namely, public key infrastructure and digital certificate issuance, verification, and management; Computer software for security, encryption, authentication, authorization, digital certificate issuance, verification and management, fraud detection, and secure socket layer (SSL) certificate management across operating environments, platforms, protocols, networks, websites and devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS), platform as a service (PAAS), and application service provider (ASP) services featuring software to secure interaction between and among users, computer networks, the internet, and connected devices; Software as a service (SAAS), platform as a service (PAAS), and application service provider (ASP) services featuring software for identity and access management, namely, public key infrastructure and digital certificate issuance, verification, and management; Software as a service (SAAS), platform as a service (PAAS), and application service provider (ASP) services featuring software to facilitate identity federation and data security; Software as a service (SAAS), platform as a service (PAAS), and application service provider (ASP) services featuring non-downloadable software for device management, namely, software over the air (SOTA), firmware over the air (FOTA), and software to facilitate updates and remote diagnostics; Software as a service (SAAS), platform as a service (PAAS), and application service provider (ASP) services featuring software for data analytics, namely, data aggregation, filtering and edge-analytics; Software as a service (SAAS), platform as a service (PAAS), and application service provider (ASP) services featuring software for encryption, authentication, authorization, security, digital certificate issuance, verification and management, fraud detection, and secure socket layer (SSL) certificate management, all of the foregoing across operating environments, platforms, protocols, networks, websites and devices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2021 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 1, 2021 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 5, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2020 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2020 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 25, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2020 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2020 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 19, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2019 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 24, 2019 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2019 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 24, 2019 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 24, 2019 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2019 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2019 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2019 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 25, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 13, 2018 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 23, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 28, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 8, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 27, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 3, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2017 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2017 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 2017 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 2, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |