USPTO serial 87284662
QMIND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HACK, ANDREA R
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with QMIND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Antonio, TX
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electric batteries for powering electric vehicles; Electrical apparatus, namely, charging stations for charging electric vehicles; Photovoltaic installation apparatus, namely, solar modules for production of electricity, solar thermal and electric receivers, tracking mechanisms and concentrating optics, and control algorithms; Photovoltaic systems that convert sunlight into electric and thermal energy; Thermostats; Climate control systems consisting of digital thermostats, air conditioning, heating, ventilation and drying control devices; Computer hardware and software system for remotely monitoring environmental conditions and controlling devices within a building, facility, grounds, or designated spatial area; Computer hardware and software systems for monitoring, diagnosing, optimizing, and predicting energy efficiency and wellness within a building and/or a power plant; Computer hardware for monitoring, diagnosing, optimizing, and predicting energy efficiency and wellness within a building and/or a power plant; Electric storage batteries; Facilities management software, namely, software to control building environment, access and security systems; Wireless controllers to remotely monitor and control the function and status of other electrical, electronic, and mechanical devices or systems, namely, HVAC (heating, ventilation and air conditioning) device, thermostats, photovoltaic/solar energy generator, battery energy storage, fuel cell, electric vehicle, water heaters, indoor air quality/water sensors, occupant sensors, electricity meter, safety and security alarm systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 14, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 18, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 11, 2017 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 9, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 27, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 26, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 2, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |