USPTO serial 87284878
DURODRAIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DURODRAIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Hangzhou Zhenglong Hose Factory
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles Ho
CHARLES HO BARRON & YOUNG INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LTD.P.O. BOX 1484, GENERAL POST OFFICEHONG KONG,Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Watering hose; Flexible hoses, not of metal; Hoses of textile material; Canvas hose pipes; Connecting hose for vehicle radiators; Junctions, not of metal, for pipes; Pipe muffs, not of metal; Sealant compounds for joints; Duct tapes; Gaskets | ACTIVE | Dec 22, 2016 |
| 019 | Gutter pipes, not of metal; Water-pipes, not of metal; Branching pipes, not of metal; Rigid pipes, not of metal, for building; Drain pipes, not of metal; Penstock pipes, not of metal; Ducts, not of metal, for ventilating and air-conditioning installations; Building plastic pipe; Aluminum-plastic composite pipe; Refractory construction materials, not of metal | ACTIVE | Dec 22, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 26, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 30, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 2, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |