USPTO serial 87287635
RINGROVER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NELMAN, JESSE M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RINGROVER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John W. Powell
JOHN W POWELL VERRILL DANA LLPONE PORTLAND SQUARE PO BOX 586PORTLAND, ME 04112-0586UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic containment systems, namely, computer software and computer hardware comprised primarily of application software for determining the position of a pet or animal and to provide location information using augmented global positioning data from a global navigation satellite system and also including computer hardware in the nature of a stimulus collar or other wearable device, namely, a collar, harness, leash, or strap to be secured to a pet or animal; none of the foregoing for use in connection with vehicles | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 2018 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 6, 2018 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 6, 2018 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 6, 2018 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 26, 2018 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2018 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 16, 2018 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 6, 2018 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2017 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 27, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 1, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 20, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 20, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 17, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 5, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2017 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |