Drawing for EDEMAP

USPTO serial 87287680

EDEMAP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELENKER, ESTHER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EDEMAP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Max Vern

Max Vern AMSTER, ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN LLP90 PARK AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Software and computer hardware for use with navigation system that enables review of edema propagation; software and computer hardware for use with ablation system that enables review of edema propagation; software and computer hardware for use with diagnostic system that enables review of edema propagation; software module for real-time edema propagation; software and computer hardware for use with navigation system that enables review of edema propagation in cardiac procedures; software and computer hardware for use with ablation system that enables review of edema propagation in cardiac procedures; software and computer hardware for use with diagnostic system that enables review of edema propagation in cardiac procedures; software module for real-time edema propagation in cardiac procedures; software and computer hardware for use with diagnostic system that enables review of lesion assessment and contact quality; software module for lesion permanency, transmurality, continuity assessment, contact quality and ablation depth indication; software module for real-time lesion assessment and contact quality; software and computer hardware for use with navigation system that enables review of catheter locations in cardiac procedures; software and computer hardware for use with diagnostic system that enables review of lesion assessment and contact quality in cardiac procedures; software and computer hardware for use with clinical recommendation system; software and computer hardware for use with cloud based medical records system; clinical recommendation system for decision making, guidance, predicting medical procedure outcome or choosing therapeutic strategy comprised of computer hardware and software used in direct association with clinical recommendation apparatuses in the nature of computers or computer serversACTIVE—
010Medical devices, namely, medical mapping systems comprised of electronic display monitors used in direct association with medical apparatuses for use in intervention or diagnostic procedures; medical diagnostics systems comprised of electronic display monitors, computer hardware, and computer software used in direct association with medical diagnosis apparatuses for use in intervention and diagnostic procedures; medical navigation systems comprised of electronic display monitors used in direct association with medical navigation apparatuses for use in cardiac procedures; medical diagnostics systems comprised of electronic display monitors used in direct association with medical diagnosis apparatuses for use in cardiac proceduresACTIVE—
042Cloud-based medical records system comprised of non-downloadable software for medical records managementACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 11, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 11, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 5, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 3, 2020EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 3, 2020EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 3, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 1, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 6, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 4, 2019EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 4, 2019EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 4, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 31, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 29, 2019EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 29, 2019EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 29, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 12, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 10, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 10, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 10, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 5, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 10, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 10, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 21, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 5, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 2, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 2, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 2, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 7, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 7, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 7, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 15, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 15, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 15, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 22, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 12, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 6, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance