USPTO serial 87288104
INTERACTIVECARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 10, 2018
- Examiner
- REEVES, APRIL ELIZABETH
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INTERACTIVECARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Salt Lake City, UT
Salt Lake City, UT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rachel Jacques
RACHEL JACQUES MASCHOFF BRENNAN1389 CENTER DRIVE, SUITE 300PARK CITY, UT 84098UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Rental of telecommunication equipment, namely, equipment for teleconferencing and video conferencing for health care consultations and services; Providing teleconferencing and video conferencing services for health care consultations and services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 19, 2017 |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) for mobile devices and tablets featuring software for the provision of health care services by health care professionals via the Internet or telecommunication networks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 19, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2024 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 10, 2023 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2019 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 10, 2018 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 6, 2018 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 5, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 26, 2018 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 16, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2018 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2018 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2018 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 12, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 6, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 7, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2017 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |