USPTO serial 87289831
BONUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CALLOWAY, CHRISTINA DENISE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BONUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
HANGZHOU CITY,, CN
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Air pumps for bicycles; Air pumps for motorcycles; Brake linings for vehicles; Brake pads for automobiles; Covers for vehicle steering wheels; Joysticks for land vehicles; Luggage carriers for vehicles; Luggage nets for vehicles; Prams; Safety seats for children, for vehicles; Shock absorbers for automobiles; Shock absorbing springs for vehicles; Steering wheels for vehicles; Sun blinds adapted for automobiles; Suspension shock absorbers for vehicles; Tires for vehicle wheels; Trailer hitches for vehicles; Trolleys; Vehicle running boards; Vehicle seats; Vehicle wheels; Anti-skid chains for vehicle tires; Anti-skid studs for vehicle tires; Anti-skid textile covers for tires; Automobile tires; Automobile spare wheel holders; Bicycle tires; Electric bicycles; Fitted car seat covers; Motor cycles; Patches for repairing inner tubes; Wheels for bicycles, cycles | ACTIVE | Oct 8, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2018 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Dec 3, 2018 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| May 7, 2018 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| May 7, 2018 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2018 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 18, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 29, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 30, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |