Drawing for NI NAUTICA

USPTO serial 87290561

NI NAUTICA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RICHARDS, SUSAN
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with NI NAUTICA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David W. Barman, Esq.

David W. Barman, Esq. THE LAW OFFICE OF DAVID W BARMAN, P.A.PO BOX 613127North Miami, FL 33261-3127UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012VesselsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 6, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 6, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2017MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Nov 21, 2017ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Nov 21, 2017OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Nov 21, 2017OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Sep 14, 2017OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 30, 2017ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 16, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 16, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 26, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 11, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 31, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 30, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 30, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 30, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 29, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 14, 2017MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jan 13, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 9, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance