USPTO serial 87290707
HANDS-FREE LIVING SINCE 1952
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HINES, REGINA C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HANDS-FREE LIVING SINCE 1952?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kia H. Wimmer
Kia H. Wimmer JanSport Apparel Corp.3411 Silverside RoadWilmington, DE 19810UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Backpacks, bags, briefcases, hand bags, messenger bags, shoulder bags, tote bags, wheeled backpacks, wheeled messenger bags, and wheeled briefcases, all specifically adapted to carry laptops, notebook computers, and personal electronic devices; protective sleeves for laptops, notebook computers and personal electronic devices; organizer pouches adapted for carrying computer cables, computer mice and portable keyboards for laptops, notebook computers, and personal electronic devices; phone lanyard, phone holders, mobile phone straps, mobile phone cases; cases adapted for laptops, notebook computers and personal electronic devices; CD and DVD cases, camera cases; sports glasses; optical glasses; sunglasses; glasses cases, including, sunglass cases; glasses chains; glasses frames; mouse pads; eye glass cords; wrist rests for computer mouse users; mouse mats; bags adapted for laptops | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | All-purpose bags and sporting bags, all-purpose carrying bags, luggage, luggage tags and cases, attache cases, briefcases, suitcases, credit card cases, business card cases and holders, carrying cases, key-cases, backpacks, waist/hip packs and strap-on packs, daypacks, fanny packs, frame backpacks, knapsacks, tote bags, duffel bags, handbags, wallets, clutches, garment bags for travel, shoe bags for travel, book bags for travel, toiletry cases sold empty, book bags, coin cases, billfolds, pack bags, ruck sacks, stuff bags, travel packs, purses, school bags, schoolchildren's backpacks, messenger bags; pouches, namely, pouches for holding make-up, keys and other personal items, pouches and bags sold empty for attachment to backpacks; folding shower and bath kits sold empty, namely, toiletry cases and bags sold empty, vanity cases sold empty, organizer bags, shoulder bags; baby carrying bags, beach bags, belt bags, game bags, mesh and net shopping bags, straps for luggage and handbags, and parts and fittings related thereto; key-cases, cosmetic bags and carrying cases sold empty, travel kits made of leather, namely, travel luggage, travel bags, and garment bags for travel, all of them made of leather; hip bags, luggage bags, overnight bags, overnight suitcases, sling bags, sling bags for carrying infants, sling bags for carrying babies, souvenir bags, suit bags, umbrella bags, waist bags, weekend bags, work bags, wheeled bags, tie cases | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by JanSport Apparel Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by JanSport Apparel Corp.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Similar marks named HANDS-FREE LIVING SINCE 1952
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2021 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 11, 2021 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 4, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2020 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 2, 2020 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 6, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2019 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2019 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 31, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2019 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 29, 2019 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 29, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 3, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 5, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 12, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 21, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 2, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 2, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 8, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2017 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 25, 2017 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jul 7, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 7, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 31, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2017 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |