Drawing for ARMATURE SYSTEMS

USPTO serial 87290907

ARMATURE SYSTEMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARLYLE, SHAUNIA P
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARMATURE SYSTEMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer L. Gilbert

JENNIFER L. GILBERT BANYS, P.C.1032 ELWELL COURT, SUITE 100PALO ALTO, CA 94043UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Design, development, and consulting services related thereto in the field of computer networks, security, wireless networking, computer software, computer hardware, and automation servicesACTIVEJan 31, 2010

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 20, 2017MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jun 20, 2017ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 19, 2017EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 13, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 9, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance