Drawing for SPHERIS

USPTO serial 87291726

SPHERIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
PERKINS, ELLEN J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPHERIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Colette A. Durst

Colette A. Durst 3M Innovative Properties Company3M Center, 2501 Hudson Road220 9E 01St. Paul, MN 55144

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for use in hospital administration, namely, for medical dictation and transcription processingACTIVE
035Revenue cycle management for health care providers, namely medical billing services; medical transcription services, message transcription services and stenographic transcription services; providing online information in the field of medical transcriptionACTIVE
036electronic transaction processing services in the nature of payment transaction processing services utilizing a computer database to facilitate revenue cycle management for healthcare providersACTIVE
042data extraction and analysis, namely, data mining in the field of healthcare informationACTIVE
044healthcare information management services, namely, maintaining files and records concerning the medical conditions of individuals; distribution of healthcare information, namely, providing medical information via the internetACTIVE
045licensing of computer softwareACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 1, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 1, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 14, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 14, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Nov 15, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Nov 13, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Nov 13, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Nov 13, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 31, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
May 29, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
May 29, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
May 29, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 28, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 3, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Oct 3, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 13, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Aug 23, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 22, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 21, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 21, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 21, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 13, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jan 10, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance