USPTO serial 87291896
ROOTSMART
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 3, 2020
- Examiner
- MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with ROOTSMART?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
VINELAND RESEARCH AND INNOVATION CENTRE
VINELAND STATION, ON, CA
Other trademarks owned by VINELAND RESEARCH AND INNOVATION CENTRE
Vineland Research and Innovations Centre Inc.
Vineland Station, CA
Other trademarks owned by Vineland Research and Innovations Centre Inc.
VINELAND RESEARCH AND INNOVATION CENTRE
VINELAND STATION, ON, CA
Other trademarks owned by VINELAND RESEARCH AND INNOVATION CENTRE
VINELAND RESEARCH AND INNOVATION CENTRE
VINELAND STATION, ON, CA
Other trademarks owned by VINELAND RESEARCH AND INNOVATION CENTRE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laura K. Pitts
Laura K. Pitts Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC1737 King Street, Suite 500Alexandria, VA 22314-2727United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Tree, flower and plant cultivation trays; seed propagation trays; seedling propagation trays; tree, flower and plant propagation trays | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VINELAND RESEARCH AND INNOVATION CENTRE
- Other trademarks owned by Vineland Research and Innovations Centre Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by VINELAND RESEARCH AND INNOVATION CENTRE
- Other trademarks owned by VINELAND RESEARCH AND INNOVATION CENTRE
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named ROOTSMART
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2025 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2025 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 29, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 19, 2025 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2025 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2020 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 17, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 27, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 22, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 12, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 23, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 2, 2019 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2019 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 20, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 20, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 4, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 28, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 14, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 8, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 8, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 29, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 1, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 21, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 17, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 17, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 25, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 30, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2017 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |