USPTO serial 87292665
COGNITIVE COMPUTING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELLO, ZACK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 100 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COGNITIVE COMPUTING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer consultation; Computer consultation in the field of Business management and consultancy; business information services; business management consulting services, healthcare management consulting services, and business management and consulting services relating to a computer that integrates Natural Language Processing (NLP), Computational Linguistics (CL), Information Retrieval (IR) and Machine Learning (ML) which is capable of learning at scale, reasoning with purpose, interacting with humans through natural interaction, understanding general human queries and formulating responses and integrates a dynamically evolving cognitive architecture system based on third-party developers to establish a system that forms intent based on user input, and creates a plan based on the intent that includes a first action object that transforms a first concept object associated with the intent into a second concept object and also includes a second action object that transforms the second concept object into a third concept object associated with a goal of the intent; the first action object and the second action object are selected from multiple action objects and the system executes the plan, and outputs a value associated with the third concept object that achieves the initial goal of the intent; business development services; data processing services and cloud-based business services, namely, business consultation services via cloud computing networks; arranging and conducting trade show exhibitions in the field of computers, computer services, information technology and electronic business transactions via a global computer network, and a computer that integrates Natural Language Processing (NLP), Computational Linguistics (CL), Information Retrieval (IR) and Machine Learning (ML) which is capable of learning at scale, reasoning with purpose, interacting with humans through natural interaction, understanding general human queries and formulating responses and integrates a dynamically evolving cognitive architecture system based on third-party developers to establish a system that forms intent based on user input, and creates a plan based on the intent that includes a first action object that transforms a first concept object associated with the intent into a second concept object and also includes a second action object that transforms the second concept object into a third concept object associated with a goal of the intent; the first action object and the second action object are selected from multiple action objects and the system executes the plan, and outputs a value associated with the third concept object that achieves the initial goal of the intent; all of the above relating specifically to a dynamically evolving cognitive architecture system, cognitive predictive analytics, and a plurality of cognitive computing technologies that provide multi-modal natural language processing, generation, reasoning and machine learning for contextual analysis, the simulation of human thought process in a computerized model via artificial intelligence, and natural interaction; Computer programming consultancy; Computer software consultancy; Computer software consultation; Computer software consulting; Computer technology consultancy; Consulting in the field of configuration management for computer hardware and software; Consulting services in the design and implementation of computer-based information systems for businesses; Consulting services in the field of computer-based information systems for businesses; Consulting services in the field of cloud computing; Consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; Consulting services in the field of hosting computer software applications; Consulting services in the fields of selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; Design, development, and consulting services related thereto in the field of Computer programming; design, updating and maintenance of computer software; computer software and hardware design for others, and consultation services in the field of computers; computer services, namely, technology support services, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing of computer hardware and computer software problems for a computer that integrates Natural Language Processing (NLP), Computational Linguistics (CL), Information Retrieval (IR) and Machine Learning (ML) which is capable of learning at scale, reasoning with purpose, interacting with humans through natural interaction, understanding general human queries and formulating responses and integrates a dynamically evolving cognitive architecture system based on third-party developers to establish a system that forms intent based on user input, and creates a plan based on the intent that includes a first action object that transforms a first concept object associated with the intent into a second concept object and also includes a second action object that transforms the second concept object into a third concept object associated with a goal of the intent; the first action object and the second action object are selected from multiple action objects and the system executes the plan, and outputs a value associated with the third concept object that achieves the initial goal of the intent; computer systems analysis, integration of computer systems and networks, computer programming for others all for use in commercial interactions over global computer networks; computer software and hardware testing services; technical project studies in the field of computer hardware and software, namely, computer system analysis studies; consultancy in the field of computer hardware, namely, consultancy regarding computer research and development; computer systems analysis; scientific and industrial research, namely, research and development of new products, biological research, technical research in the field of a computer that integrates Natural Language Processing (NLP), Computational Linguistics (CL), Information Retrieval (IR) and Machine Learning (ML) which is capable of learning at scale, reasoning with purpose, interacting with humans through natural interaction, understanding general human queries and formulating responses and integrates a dynamically evolving cognitive architecture system based on third-party developers to establish a system that forms intent based on user input, and creates a plan based on the intent that includes a first action object that transforms a first concept object associated with the intent into a second concept object and also includes a second action object that transforms the second concept object into a third concept object associated with a goal of the intent; the first action object and the second action object are selected from multiple action objects and the system executes the plan, and outputs a value associated with the third concept object that achieves the initial goal of the intent; scientific research for medical purpose; computer systems integration services; computer consultation services; consulting services in the field of design, consulting services in the field of healthcare management services, consulting services in the field of business management; consulting services in the field of hospitality management, consulting services in the field of healthcare delivery systems, consulting in the field of aviation management, consulting services in the field of insurance and reinsurance management services, consulting services in the field of general administration services, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; computer systems design services for others; computer systems analysis; interconnection of computer hardware and software, namely, integration of computer systems and networks | PARTIALLY PAID | Apr 17, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2020 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Feb 24, 2020 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 9, 2019 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2019 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Sep 11, 2019 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Aug 9, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 4, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 8, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 6, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2018 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Jun 11, 2018 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 11, 2018 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 2, 2018 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 9, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 8, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |