Drawing for LASHOLOGIST CHOICE

USPTO serial 87293349

LASHOLOGIST CHOICE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5504040Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 26, 2018
Examiner
DUBIN, DAVID I
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with LASHOLOGIST CHOICE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patricia M. Flanagan

Patricia M. Flanagan Fox Rothschild LLP997 Lenox Drive, Building 3Princeton Pike Corporate CenterLawrenceville, FL 08648-2311

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetics; eye make-up remover; shampoos; eyelash shampoos in the nature of shampoos; face care preparations, namely, facial cleansers; Eyebrow shampoos in the nature of shampoos; barrier cream, namely, cosmetic creams; eye rinse, namely, non-medicated eye-washes; eye cream; exfoliating creamsSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDMar 11, 2017

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 10, 2025C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Jun 26, 2023REM1COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 11, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 11, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 26, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 25, 2018SUNANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED—
May 24, 2018CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
May 23, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 23, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 22, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 16, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 22, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2018CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2018SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 20, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 6, 2018IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Feb 6, 2018EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Aug 8, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 13, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 24, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 13, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 13, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 13, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 13, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 5, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 4, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 4, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 3, 2017GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Apr 3, 2017GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Apr 3, 2017EPENCOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY—
Apr 3, 2017CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Apr 3, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 14, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 12, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance