USPTO serial 87293535
DESIGNA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 16, 2019
- Examiner
- SALES, HEATHER ALISON
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with DESIGNA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DESIGNA Verkehrsleittechnik GmbH
24109 Kiel, DE
DESIGNA Verkehrsleittechnik GmbH
24109 Kiel, DE
DESIGNA Verkehrsleittechnik GmbH
Kiel, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CECELIA M. PERRY
CECELIA M. PERRY MCGLEW AND TUTTLE, P.C.SCARBOROUGH STATIONSCARBOROUGH, NY 10510-9227United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | (Based on 44(e) and Based on Use in Commerce) ) Data processing apparatus, electrical and mechanical data processing equipment and accessories, namely, computers, computer servers, input and output devices, namely, computer hardware, computer peripherals, and computer operating software, data communication devices for use in transferring data from computer servers to automatic gates and from automatic gates to computer servers; automatic access control installations in particular access control installations for parking places and car parks, namely, access control, gate and payment systems for car parks systems comprising computer hardware, computer peripherals, and computer operating software, for use in access control, gate and payment systems for car parks systems; electronic payment terminals; software for computers, mobile phones, mobile devices, mobile applications for handed digital electronic devices and mobile devices, downloadable, all the aforementioned goods for automatic access control installations for parking places and car parks and payment terminals, mobile application for mobile data processing equipment and cell phones for automatic access control installations for parking places and car parks and payment terminals | ACTIVE | Aug 7, 2001 |
| 037 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Installation, maintenance and repair of access control systems and electronic payment terminals | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | (Based on Use in Commerce) IT services, namely, IT consulting services and integration services, computer software development, computer software programming and software implementation for others, web site hosting services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DESIGNA Verkehrsleittechnik GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by DESIGNA Verkehrsleittechnik GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by DESIGNA Verkehrsleittechnik GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DESIGNA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2025 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2025 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 8, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 4, 2025 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2024 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 12, 2019 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2019 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 7, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 16, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2018 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2018 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 22, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 25, 2018 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2018 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 30, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 6, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 6, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 15, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 2, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 20, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 8, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 8, 2017 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 29, 2017 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 26, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 21, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 12, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 16, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |