USPTO serial 87293915
BEAN COFFEE ROASTERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STOIDES, KATHERINE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BEAN COFFEE ROASTERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel A. Thomson
DANIEL A. THOMSON EMERSON THOMSON BENNETT1914 AKRON-PENINSULA ROADAKRON, OH 44313UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electric coffee grinders; Electrical coffee grinders; Juice machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Electric coffee brewers; Electric coffee machines; Electric coffee makers; Electric coffee percolators; Electric coffee pots; Electric coffee roasters; Electric coffee urns; Electric espresso machines; Electric tea kettles; Electric tea pots; Powered coffee, seed and cocoa bean roasters | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Coffee pots; Coffee pots not of precious metal; Hand-operated coffee grinders; Non-electrical coffee grinders; Non-electric coffee dripper for brewing coffee; Non-electric coffee makers; Non-electric coffee percolators; Non-electric coffee pots; Non-electric coffee dripper for brewing coffee | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Bagels; Bread and pastry; Chai tea; Citron tea; Coffee beans; Coffee-based beverages containing ice cream (affogato); Danish pastries; English muffins; Ginger tea; Ginseng tea; Green coffee; Ground coffee beans; Instant coffee; Instant tea; Lime tea; Mixtures of coffee and chicory; Muffins; Oolong tea; Pastries; Pastries with fruit; Red ginseng tea; Roasted coffee beans; Rooibos tea; Rosemary tea; Sage tea; Tea bags; Tea for infusions | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Bean International Group, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named BEAN COFFEE ROASTERS
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 3, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 5, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2017 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 5, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 19, 2017 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2017 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 18, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2017 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |