USPTO serial 87294753
BAI SHUN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AWRICH, ELLEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BAI SHUN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Chandeliers; Film stage lighting apparatus; Flat panel lighting apparatus; Flood lights; Fragrance dispensing unit which also features a night light; Infrared lamps; Lamp bases; Lamp bulbs; Lamps; Lampshades; Lanterns for lighting; LED (light emitting diode) lighting fixtures; LED candles; LED lamps; LED landscape lights; LED light assemblies for street lights, signs, commercial lighting, automobiles, buildings, and other architectural uses; LED light bulbs; LED light strips for decorative purposes; LED lighting assemblies for illuminated signs; LED lighting fixtures for indoor and outdoor lighting applications; LED lighting systems, namely, LED modules, power supplies, and wiring; LED lights for strings, flowers, branches and other ornamental decorations; LED underwater lights; Light Emitting Diode (LED) plant grow light; Light emitting diodes (LEDs) incorporated into metallic and adhesive plastic reflector film for illuminating transparent balloons and similar products; Light post luminaires; Lighted disco balls; Lighted outdoor holiday sculptures and wire frame statues; Lighted party-themed decorations, electric light decorative strings; Lighting apparatus for theatres, clubs and discotheques; Lighting devices for showcases; Lighting fixtures for use in parking lots and walkways; Lighting tubes; Lights for use in growing plants; Lights, electric, for Christmas trees; Luminaires, using light emitting diodes (LEDs) as a light source, for street or roadway lighting; Organic light emitting diodes (OLED) lighting devices; Overhead lamps; Sconce lighting fixtures; Solar powered lamps; Solar thermal air systems for heating purposes; Street lamps; Strip lighting for indoor use; Suspension pendulums for suspension lamps | ACTIVE | Dec 20, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 2, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 6, 2018 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 6, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 5, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 5, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2017 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |