Drawing for GCR

USPTO serial 87295022

GCR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JOHNSON, DANYTHE ELIZABETH HA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GCR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steve Zlatos

STEVE ZLATOS WOODARD EMHARDT MORIARTY MCNETT & HENRY, LLP111 MONUMENT CIRCLESUITE 3700INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-5137

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041providing of training in the field of healthcare; arranging and conducting of healthcare educational congresses; organizing of healthcare education exhibitions; arranging and conducting of seminars in the field of healthcareACTIVE—
042computer programming; software creation; quality control; provision of search engines for the internet; electronic data storage; testing services for the certification of quality or standards; testing, analysis and evaluation of the goods and services of others for the purpose of certification; certification quality control, namely, testing, analysis and evaluation of the services of others to determine conformity with certification standardsACTIVE—
044online health consultancy, online therapeutic consultancy, namely, providing online consulting services to therapists; online pharmaceutical consultancy; telemedicine services; online consultancy in the field of healthcare, medical services, nursing services, pharmaceutical care; education, namely providing information to others in the field of healthcareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 1, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 1, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 1, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 29, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 29, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 29, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 29, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 3, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 3, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 14, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 23, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 23, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 23, 2018DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Jan 30, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 30, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 26, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 16, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 27, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 4, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 4, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 28, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 28, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 28, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 4, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 3, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 3, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 4, 2017ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 23, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 23, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 23, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 13, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 12, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 12, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 12, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 12, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 4, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 18, 2017MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jan 17, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 13, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance