USPTO serial 87295102
JOBERTISING.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- O'ROURKE, JONATHAN RYAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JOBERTISING.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephanie S. Buntin
STEPHANIE S BUNTIN HOWARD & HOWARD ATTORNEYS PLLC450 W FOURTH STREETROYAL OAK, MI 48067-2557UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Organizing and conducting trade shows in the field of job fairs for commercial purposes | ACTIVE | Jun 5, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 26, 2018 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 26, 2018 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 26, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 15, 2018 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 18, 2018 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2018 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2018 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 17, 2018 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 17, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 17, 2018 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 27, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 26, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 5, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 4, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2017 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |