USPTO serial 87295299
VITACHOCO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VITACHOCO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Madelon L. Lapidus
CATHERINE C MILLER HOLLAND & HART LLPPO BOX 8749 ATTN TRADEMARK DOCKETINGDENVER, CO 80201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Dietetic foods and beverages adapted for medical use; Nutritional supplements; Vitamin preparations and mineral preparations; food supplements | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2018 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 27, 2018 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 27, 2018 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 27, 2018 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 5, 2017 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 20, 2017 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 14, 2017 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 14, 2017 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | ISPO | WITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - PETITIONS OFFICE REQUEST | — |
| Sep 6, 2017 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2017 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 26, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 8, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 8, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2017 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 3, 2017 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |