USPTO serial 87297071
COMPCLOUD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHADAB, SETH WILLIG
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COMPCLOUD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan Neuberger Weller
SUSAN NEUBERGER WELLER MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS, GLOVSKY AND POPEO, P.701 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, N.W.SUITE 900WASHINGTON, DC 20004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing online non-downloadable software and data platform in the nature of software for data processing for enabling user access to data and services relating to employee compensation and performance; providing online non-downloadable computer software platform for participating in surveys, comparing job salaries, managing surveys, and providing reports and data assessment; providing online non-downloadable software for enabling user access to public company proxy and related data; on line services, namely, provision of an on line, interactive compensation and benefits calculator; providing online non-downloadable software for allowing employers to manage the employment lifecycle through automation of the human resource planning, acquisition, alignment, compensation, performance management, development, retention and retirement processes, and registered users to create online career profiles, perform competency assessments, identify matching career opportunities, explore career paths and conduct interactive career planning, development and learning; providing a website featuring articles, data sheets, e-books, infographics, videos and white papers in the field of employee compensation and performance | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2018 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Nov 15, 2018 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2018 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 29, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 29, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 14, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 6, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 9, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2017 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |