USPTO serial 87297096
I-RECOGNIZE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FLOWERS, JAY K
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with I-RECOGNIZE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sean P. McMahon
SEAN P. MCMAHON OSTROLENK FABER LLP845 Third Avenue8th FloorNEW YORK, NY 10022Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for encrypting and authenticating data; computer software for encryption; computer software for use in the encryption and decryption of digital files; software for downloading and implementing access control functionality for identity verification and access or denial of access to digital data, physical premises or computer networks; physical access control systems and devices, namely, smart cards in the nature of contactless integrated circuit cards and proximity cards, RFID cards, namely, radio frequency identification (RFID) credentials, namely, cards and tags, and readers for radio frequency identification credentials, NFC enabled devices, smart card readers, RFID readers; logical access control systems and devices, namely, smart cards in the nature of contactless integrated circuit cards and proximity cards, RFID cards radio frequency identification (RFID) credentials, namely, cards and tags, and readers for radio frequency identification credentials, smart card readers, RFID readers; encoded smart cards containing programming used for access control systems; electronic card readers; electronic RFID card and controllers for controlling access to a premises; printers; color printers; identification card printers; encoded printed identification cards; encoded blank plastic identification cards; electronic identification card printers; computer software and hardware for use in controlling network functions and providing access in the field of network and server security; electronic access control system comprising of computer software and magnetically/optically encoded and RFID identification badges for tracking visitors; optical memory cards | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software and applications for managing, locating, activating and revoking near field communication (NFC) tags, digital keys, encoded smart cards and identity data; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for implementing access control functionality for identity verification and access or denial of access to digital data, physical premises or computer networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SCHOLARCHIP CARD, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by SCHOLARCHIP CARD, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named I-RECOGNIZE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 10, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 10, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2020 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2020 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 11, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2019 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 9, 2019 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 11, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2019 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2019 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 13, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 9, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 9, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 14, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 25, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 9, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 26, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 26, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 6, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 8, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |