USPTO serial 87297362
WORLD TECH SUMMIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 2, 2019
- Examiner
- KUNG, KAELIE ELIZABETH
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 701 means the registration is active and the first Section 8 declaration of continued use was accepted. The next major deadline is the combined Section 8 and Section 9 filing at the 10-year anniversary. Calendar the 10-year Section 8 and 9 combined renewal.
Need help with WORLD TECH SUMMIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Tiburon, CA, US
Tiburon, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Adriano Pacifici
Adriano Pacifici Intellectual Property Consulting, LLC400 Poydras StreetSuite 1400New Orleans, LA 70130Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising and promotional services; marketing services, namely, email marketing, consumer research, and branded sponsorships; business marketing services; business networking; business research; general business networking referral services, namely, promoting the goods and services of others by passing business leads and referrals among group members; market research services; business networking services; online advertising and marketing services; providing an online searchable database featuring classified ad listings and employment opportunities; promoting the goods and services of others by arranging for sponsors to affiliate their goods and services with an awards program; conducting public opinion polls; conducting public opinion online polls; arranging and conducting trade shows, expositions and exhibitions in the fields of computers, computer software, online services, high technology, information technology and information services | ACTIVE | Jan 18, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2026 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2026 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Feb 23, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 2, 2025 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2024 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2019 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 28, 2019 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 24, 2019 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 23, 2019 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2019 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 22, 2019 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2019 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 9, 2019 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2019 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2019 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 8, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 8, 2019 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 8, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 8, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 16, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 16, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 6, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 27, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 27, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 27, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 26, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 28, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2017 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |