Drawing for LUXOPHIE

USPTO serial 87297425

LUXOPHIE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AVENT, TEAGUE A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 126

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LUXOPHIE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennie S. Malloy, Esq.

JENNIE S MALLOY MALLOY & MALLOY PL2800 SW 3RD AVENUEMIAMI, FL 33129UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Wholesale and retail store services featuring jewelry, watches, fashion accessories, travel accessories, apparel, dresses, skirts, blouses, shirts, jackets, sweaters, scarves, handbags, purses, wallets, sunglasses, eyeglassesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 13, 2020MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 2, 2020ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 2, 2020EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 19, 2019EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Aug 29, 2019RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Aug 28, 2019CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jul 29, 2019JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 23, 2019RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
May 23, 2019CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Apr 29, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 29, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 29, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 23, 2019ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 23, 2019EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 23, 2019JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 23, 2019EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 23, 2018CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED—
Oct 22, 2018CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Sep 25, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 24, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 4, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 10, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 10, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 10, 2018CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Apr 9, 2018CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Mar 17, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 16, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 16, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 18, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 18, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 26, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 25, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 25, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 20, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 20, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 5, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 19, 2017MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jan 18, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance