USPTO serial 87297425
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Montevideo, UY
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennie S. Malloy, Esq.
JENNIE S MALLOY MALLOY & MALLOY PL2800 SW 3RD AVENUEMIAMI, FL 33129UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Wholesale and retail store services featuring jewelry, watches, fashion accessories, travel accessories, apparel, dresses, skirts, blouses, shirts, jackets, sweaters, scarves, handbags, purses, wallets, sunglasses, eyeglasses | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2020 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 2, 2020 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 2, 2020 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 19, 2019 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Aug 29, 2019 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2019 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 29, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 23, 2019 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2019 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 29, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 23, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2019 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 23, 2019 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 23, 2018 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2018 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 25, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 4, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 10, 2018 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2018 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 17, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 18, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 26, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 20, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2017 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |