Drawing for TEABLY

USPTO serial 87297780

TEABLY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RICHARDS, LESLIE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TEABLY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Troy M. Schmelzer

TROY M SCHMELZER BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP11601 WILSHIRE BOULEVARDSUITE 1400LOS ANGELES, CA 90025-0509

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Tea-based beveragesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 12, 2019MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 10, 2019ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 10, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 25, 2019EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Sep 13, 2018GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 13, 2018GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 13, 2018CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jul 23, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 21, 2018GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 21, 2018GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 21, 2018CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 7, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 7, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 7, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 7, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 4, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 30, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 30, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 30, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 30, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 31, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 31, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 31, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 10, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 9, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 9, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 10, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 4, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 18, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 14, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance