Drawing for LE PAPILLON

USPTO serial 87299708

LE PAPILLON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with LE PAPILLON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Alpenstocks; Beach bags; Canes; Frames for umbrellas or parasols; Umbrella covers; Umbrella handles; Umbrella or parasol ribs; Umbrella rings; Umbrella sticks; Umbrellas; Parasols; Travelling bagsACTIVEJan 8, 2017
020Chairs; Cushions; Divans; Pillows; Settees; Table tops; Tables; Dining tables; Drawer pulls of plastic or wood, cork, reed, cane, wicker, shell, amber, mother-of-pearl, meerschaum and substitutes for all these materials; Easy-chairs; Lounge chairs; Moses baskets; Office chairs; Piano benches; Side tables; Tea tables; Vice benches being furnitureACTIVEJan 8, 2017

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 19, 2020MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 19, 2020ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 4, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 4, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 4, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 2020RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 7, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 9, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 5, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 5, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 5, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 16, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 16, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 15, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 10, 2018ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 17, 2018RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 10, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 2, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 30, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 30, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 30, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 6, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 6, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 6, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 5, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 20, 2017MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jan 19, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 16, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance