Drawing for PENINSULASTEEL

USPTO serial 87299768

PENINSULASTEEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE, DOUGLAS
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PENINSULASTEEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sherri L. Eastley

Sherri L. Eastley Pirkey Barber PLLC600 Congress Avenue, Suite 2120Austin, TX 78701UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal wires; metal fasteners, namely, nails and screws; metal building materials, namely, wire, rebar, wire mesh, and bar support, namely, beam bolster, high chairs, and slab bolster; metal rebar and wire mesh for concrete; metal wire mesh, metal nails, metal screws, and metal slab bolsterACTIVE—
035Wholesale distributorship services featuring construction building products, namely, metal pipes, namely, threaded rod, pencil rod, and smooth dowel, metal wires, metal fasteners, namely, nails and screws, metal building materials, namely, wire, rebar, wire mesh, and bar support, namely, beam bolster, high chairs, and slab bolster, metal rebar and wire mesh for concrete, metal wire mesh, metal nails, metal screws, and metal slab bolsterACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 7, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 7, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 30, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 30, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 31, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 31, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 10, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 10, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 21, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 6, 2018PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 5, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 26, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 26, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 12, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 11, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 11, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 13, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 8, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 5, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 21, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 22, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 20, 2017MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jan 19, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 16, 2017NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance